Imagine swiping through your DoorDash checkout screen, contemplating the burrito bowl that would soon arrive at your doorstep. Among the standard payment options appears something new: the ability to finance your dinner in four equal, interest-free installments through Klarna, a buy-now-pay-later service recently integrated into DoorDash’s payment system.
Five years ago, the concept of paying for tacos in installments might have seemed absurd. Today, it’s becoming normalized—a payment option millions of Americans will encounter when ordering their next meal.
That normalization signals a seismic shift in America’s relationship with debt—one where even everyday meals become financialized commodities. The March 2025 partnership between food delivery giant DoorDash and Swedish fintech company Klarna marks an unprecedented expansion of buy-now-pay-later services into essential consumption categories, raising profound questions about financial sustainability and the systemic risks of turning dinner deliveries into tradable debt securities.
The New Debt Menu
In gleaming offices overlooking San Francisco Bay, DoorDash executives celebrated the announcement of their partnership with Klarna as an innovation in “payment flexibility.” The collaboration allows customers to divide purchases into four interest-free installments or defer payments until their next paycheck—a system being rolled out across DoorDash’s expanding empire of restaurant deliveries, groceries, and retail items.
For Klarna, which recently filed for its U.S. IPO on the New York Stock Exchange, this alliance represents an ambitious expansion beyond traditional retail into everyday necessities. David Sykes, Klarna’s Chief Commercial Officer, framed the partnership as making “convenience even more accessible for millions of Americans,” promising smarter payment solutions for groceries and takeout.
What remains unspoken in these corporate announcements is the more cynical arithmetic beneath: statistical evidence indicates BNPL services boost average ticket sales by 30-50% and increase conversion rates among hesitant consumers. For merchants like DoorDash, the financial calculation is straightforward—customers spend more when freed from the immediate constraints of their bank accounts.
The Architecture of Modern Debt
The rise of buy-now-pay-later financing over the past five years represents a profound restructuring of consumer credit. Unlike traditional lending, these services often perform only “soft” credit checks that don’t appear on credit reports. They market themselves as interest-free alternatives to credit cards, emphasizing the absence of revolving debt while downplaying the late fees that provide substantial revenue.
Marshall Lux, fellow at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at the Harvard Kennedy School, views these developments with alarm. “It’s hard to buy anything anymore without being asked if you want to pay over time,” Lux noted in a recent analysis. He characterized the BNPL sector not as a boom but as a bubble, existing in a “legal gray space” with minimal regulatory oversight.
The mechanics of this financial ecosystem extend far beyond the simple transaction between customer and delivery service. Behind each installment payment lies an intricate web of merchant fees, securitized debt, and risk assessments. Klarna bundles these small-dollar loans into securities that can be sold to investors—a process reminiscent of the mortgage-backed securities that played a central role in the 2008 financial crisis.
“BNPL’s rapid growth is driven primarily by younger consumers, with two-thirds of BNPL borrowers considered subprime,” Lux observed, identifying a demographic particularly vulnerable to economic downturns. “These are the people that can’t afford to be hurt.”
From Mortgages to Munchies
Economic historians see troubling parallels between today’s BNPL expansion and previous credit bubbles. The financialization of everyday consumption follows a familiar pattern: beginning with large, durable purchases like homes and cars, extending to furniture and appliances, and now reaching food delivery—which traditionally would be considered a cash expense.
The timeline of credit expansion has accelerated dramatically. Where mortgage securitization took decades to evolve into the complex instruments that destabilized global markets in 2008, buy-now-pay-later services have progressed from financing Peloton bikes to burritos in just a few years.
The integration with DoorDash represents what many consumer advocates consider “the final frontier” of debt normalization. When people finance a sandwich in four payments, society crosses a psychological threshold that fundamentally distorts our relationship with both money and food.
The latest data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York shows total household debt reached $18.99 trillion by January 2025, with serious delinquencies (payments 90+ days late) on auto loans and credit cards hitting 15-year highs. These figures exclude most BNPL arrangements, which remain largely unreported to credit bureaus—creating what financial analysts call “phantom debt” that invisibly accumulates on household balance sheets without appearing in official statistics.
A February 2025 survey by the Financial Health Network found that 52% of BNPL users maintain multiple active payment plans simultaneously, with 31% juggling payments from three or more providers. The study revealed 47% of users had missed at least one payment in the previous year, triggering cascading late fees that average $87 per incident when accounting for bank overdraft charges.
The Personal Calculus of Convenience
For many consumers, the decision to finance a meal delivery begins with legitimate concerns about cash flow. Consider the scenario of a nurse and single mother needing groceries three days before payday. In such cases, BNPL services bridge that gap without the high interest rates that credit cards typically charge.
Consumer research confirms her reasoning isn’t unusual. According to the Federal Reserve System’s 2023 report on economic well-being, 56% of BNPL users indicated the payment scheme was “the only way I could afford [the purchase].” As inflation has eroded purchasing power, these services have become financial coping mechanisms rather than mere conveniences.
Yet behavioral economists highlight the cognitive distortion that installment plans create. Anish Nagpal, an associate professor at the University of Melbourne who studies decision-making, notes these services work by “separating the pain of losing something—your money—from the pleasure of receiving something,” which fundamentally alters consumption patterns and increases overall spending.
This psychological manipulation appears especially effective with food. Neuroscience research suggests food triggers immediate reward pathways in our brains. When combined with delayed payment, these services effectively short-circuit normal financial restraint mechanisms—creating a powerful “double whammy” that encourages overconsumption through the combination of immediate gratification and postponed financial pain.
The Securitization Gamble
What truly distinguishes today’s BNPL expansion from previous credit innovations is the sophisticated financial infrastructure operating behind simple checkout buttons. Klarna packages and sells BNPL receivables to investors through securitization—a process nearly identical to how banks bundled subprime mortgage loans before the 2008 financial crisis.
Recent regulatory filings reveal Klarna had $867 million in securitized loans that don’t appear on its balance sheet as of early 2025. The company also engages in “synthetic securitization,” transferring credit risk while keeping loans on its books—a practice that obscures the true extent of exposure from investors and regulators alike.
The mechanics of this financial alchemy are particularly concerning given Klarna’s target demographic. According to Marshall Lux of Harvard’s Kennedy School, “BNPL’s rapid growth is driven primarily by younger consumers, with two-thirds of BNPL borrowers considered subprime,” identifying a demographic particularly vulnerable to economic downturns. “These are the people that can’t afford to be hurt.”
In essence, Klarna is creating financial products from debt obligations of the consumers least equipped to handle economic shocks—then selling this repackaged risk to investors who may not fully understand the underlying fragility. This mirrors the subprime mortgage crisis playbook, just with significantly smaller individual transaction sizes.
Multiple red flags appear in Klarna’s public disclosures: Their IPO filing acknowledged “material weakness” in internal financial controls; credit loss rates are rising across their portfolio; and regulatory scrutiny is intensifying, with Sweden’s financial regulator actively investigating the company’s credit risk management practices.
Global Contrasts
While American consumers encounter expanding BNPL options with minimal guardrails, the international regulatory landscape looks markedly different. The European Union has moved decisively to regulate these services under its Consumer Credit Directive, requiring standardized disclosures and stricter affordability checks. The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority announced comprehensive BNPL regulations in January 2025 that limit marketing practices and mandate credit reporting.
Australia, where BNPL services first gained mainstream traction, implemented a mandatory code of practice in 2024 requiring providers to conduct thorough income and expense verification before extending credit.
American regulators, by contrast, have only recently begun addressing these concerns. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s reclassification of BNPL lenders as credit card providers represents a first step, but fails to address the systemic risks posed by securitization of increasingly fragile consumer debt obligations.
The New Financial Alchemy
For financial analysts, the DoorDash-Klarna partnership represents a troubling evolution of debt securitization. Unlike mortgages, which are backed by tangible assets, BNPL food delivery debt represents consumed goods with no residual value—effectively creating financial instruments backed by nothing but promises from financially vulnerable consumers.
This fundamental difference highlights the unprecedented risk: with food, there’s no collateral. You eat it, it’s gone. Yet the debt remains, bundled into securities and sold to investors who may not fully grasp this distinction. It’s a house of cards built on the assumption that financially stretched consumers will prioritize repaying their food delivery debt.
Expert Warnings and Regulatory Response
For Gary Hufbauer, an economist quoted in recent coverage, the emergence of meal financing reflects “true desperation” in the economy. “People who are paying for their next meal in installments have reached the end of the line,” he observed.
Congressional representatives have voiced similar concerns. Rep. Frank Pallone characterized the DoorDash-Klarna partnership as “not a win—it’s a warning,” suggesting it indicates wages aren’t keeping pace with inflation rather than representing genuine financial innovation.
Financial stability experts are increasingly drawing parallels to pre-2008 subprime lending practices. The creation of securitized financial products from small food delivery transactions represents a troubling evolution—individual orders seem too small to matter, but at scale, they create meaningful systemic vulnerabilities.
The CFPB and SEC have announced a joint task force to examine BNPL securitization practices, with preliminary findings expected by June 2025. Meanwhile, three state attorneys general have launched investigations into Klarna’s disclosures and credit practices.
Looking Forward: The Risk Horizon
Financial forecasting firm Cornerstone Advisors projects the BNPL market will grow to $182 billion by 2026, with everyday expenses like food delivery representing its fastest-expanding segment. This trajectory raises critical questions about Klarna’s long-term solvency if default rates continue rising.
Several scenarios concern economists:
The Standard Default Cascade: Rising unemployment triggers widespread BNPL defaults, reducing investor appetite for securitized BNPL debt, thus constraining Klarna’s ability to finance new purchases and forcing a rapid contraction in available credit.
The Phantom Debt Crisis: The accumulation of invisible BNPL obligations across multiple platforms creates unsustainable household debt burdens that eventually trigger defaults across multiple credit categories simultaneously.
The Regulatory Shock: Sudden regulatory changes force BNPL providers to recognize losses and restrict lending practices, causing liquidity constraints that ripple through securitized debt markets.
According to stress tests conducted by financial risk firm Moody’s Analytics, even a moderate economic slowdown could push BNPL default rates to 12-17%, potentially triggering significant losses for investors in securitized BNPL debt.
The Price of Convenience
For many Americans, the everyday reality of financed food delivery represents something more immediate than economic trends or systemic risks. Picture the doorbell ringing with the arrival of an installment-plan dinner. While understanding it may not be the healthiest financial habit, millions of consumers juggling rent increases, student loans, and medical bills might just want a burrito without confronting the fact that they can’t technically afford it at that moment.
That momentary relief from financial reality may be precisely what makes buy-now-pay-later food delivery so alluring—and potentially hazardous—to millions of Americans navigating an increasingly precarious economic landscape. What began as a retail innovation has transformed into something more fundamental: not just the financialization of purchases, but the securitization of our daily bread itself, with risks that extend far beyond individual households to the stability of the financial system.
As social media overflows with gallows humor about “defaulting on burrito loans” and “DoorDash debt collectors,” the uneasy laughter masks a sobering reality: we are witnessing the creation of complex financial instruments from the most basic human need—food—and the consequences may prove far from appetizing.
Share this post